EchoReview
WORKFLOW EVALUATION — NOT FOR PATIENT CARE. AI is research-only. No identifiable data without signed agreements.
Read full notice

EchoReview supports cardiologist review and documented sign-off. AI is in development, research-only, and must not guide diagnosis, treatment, urgency, or routing. Routine uploads and reporting exclude experimental AI. Separate research benchmarks remain available to administrators. Hospital use requires an approved data flow; do not upload identifiable patient data without required agreements and verified provider coverage.

Non-clinical workflow evaluation

Discuss a hospital evaluation

Discuss a demonstration or a retrospective / shadow evaluation of study handoff, cardiologist review, and documented sign-off. Staffing, duration, fees, and goals are agreed with each site. Existing clinical care and escalation remain unchanged.

AI is in development and research-only, not part of the workflow-only offer. Routine uploads and reporting exclude experimental AI. Hospital approval and privacy checks remain required before a patient-data pilot.

Proposed 90-day evaluation schedule

A planning framework, not a launch or delivery commitment. Site approvals, integration testing, and reader availability may change the schedule.

Days 0–30

Stand-up & onboarding

Governance, access, baseline metrics

  • Review and execute required agreements; verify provider coverage
  • Obtain local research / QI determination and required approvals
  • Test approved accounts, workspace access, and offboarding
  • Capture baseline: avg. read turnaround, weekly echo volume, after-hours backlog
  • Verify identifiers, image delivery, and AI-free evaluation arrangements
Deliverable: Approved scope, evidence checklist, baseline measures
Days 31–60

Workflow evaluation

Approved data, existing care unchanged

  • Review a site-agreed number of permitted de-identified studies
  • Cardiologist records independent evaluation interpretations
  • Track handoff delays, image completeness, and sign-off status
  • Review workflow issues at a site-agreed cadence
  • Log all UX friction in shared issue tracker
Deliverable: Workflow measures, image-delivery issues, mid-evaluation review
Days 61–90

Outcomes & decision

Evidence package, go / no-go

  • Measure simulated turnaround impact vs. baseline
  • Survey workload and workflow fit using an agreed instrument
  • Prepare an evaluation summary; publication requires separate agreement
  • Site PI + EchoReview review safety log, audit trail, addendums
  • Decision: extend, expand to second site, or close-out
Deliverable: Final evaluation summary and continue / close-out decision

Success criteria the research team agrees to up front

  • Study count and inclusion criteria agreed before launch
  • Arrival-to-sign time compared with the facility’s baseline
  • Delivered views, clip completeness, and missing evidence documented
  • Privacy incidents and failed deliveries recorded and investigated
  • Reviewer identity, sign-off, and corrections checked
  • Workload, usability, and costs measured without assumed savings

A shorter feasibility evaluation can be discussed. No fixed case count, clinical outcome, publication, or turnaround improvement is promised.

Hospital

Echo program

Primary contact

Anything else?

This request is for workflow evaluation, not patient-care use. Do not include patient data. Identifiable data requires approved arrangements, required agreements, and verified provider coverage.